Effect of Formative Feedback on Enhancing Ways of Contributing to a Explanation-Seeking Dialogue in Grade 2
نویسنده
چکیده
This research explores the extent to which a new assessments can help students to enhance their ways of contributing to explanation-seeking discourse, and also investigates the extent to which expanding contribution repertoires helps students to advance community knowledge as a whole. To this end, this study tested both pedagogical and technological supports designed to raise the level of students’ dialogue. Repeated “meta-discourse sessions” were integrated in students Knowledge Building inquiry as a form of pedaogigical support, and students were also exposed to three forms of automated feedback that included Word Clouds, a “MetaDiscourse” bar graph, and Word Network visualizations that displayed important aspects of their discourse. Results indicate that the MetaDiscourse bar graph is particularly conducive to helping students expand their contribution repertories in targeted areas and that repeated metadiscourse sessions are valuable for aiding students in advancing group knowledge in general. Introduction The ability to produce new knowledge can be described as a capacity for “productive work that advances the frontiers of knowledge as these are perceived by [a] community” (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2003). Increasingly, societal capacity for innovation and the creation of new knowledge is required to address the sorts of complex problems that characterize the 21st century, such as accelerating climate change, widespread financial downturns, and global political unrest (David & Foray, 2003; Homer-Dixon, 2000). The research reported in this study is concerned with increasing society’s capacity to create new knowledge by testing educational innovations aimed at enhancing students’ abilities to contribute to knowledge creation processes. Given that new knowledge is generated through the discourse that characterizes a particular knowledge community, this study focuses on testing pedagogical and technological supports that can help students expand the ways they contribute to collaborative explanation-seeking discourse. This research uses a Knowledge Building approach, which is a pedagogy that is uniquely suited to research for developing students’ capacity to work creatively with knowledge. Knowledge Building can be described as “the production and continual improvement of ideas of value to a community” (Scardamalia & Beretier, 2003, p. 1370). Knowledge Building pedagogy is dedicated to immersing students in a culture of knowledge creation that places the advancement of community knowledge as the explicit and shared goal (Scardamalia & Bereiter,
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Corrective Feedback (Written and Verbal) of Teachers in the Formative Evaluation of the Learning Love in First grade Male Students in the Ninth Grade of English language Learning
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of corrective feedback (written and verbal) of teachers in a formative evaluation of the learning love of first grade male students in the nith grade in Alashtar city, Iran. Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study in which the pretest-posttest control group was used. The sample consisted of 40 subjects selected by mult...
متن کاملThe effect of Corrective Feedback (Written and Verbal) teachers in the Formative Evaluation On the amount of Emotional Excitement (emotions related to learning and emotions related to the lesson) male students
Abstract: Introduction: The system of education, like other systems, has its own principles and characteristics. One of the essential features of this evaluation is the provision of useful feedback, through which one can identify important educational goals and, among other things, examine the important needs for language learning. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of fe...
متن کاملPlato Seeking for “One Real Explanation” in Phaedo
What this essay is to discuss is Plato''s theory of explanation in Phaedo. In this dialogue, we observe that Socrates criticizes both the natural scientists’ explanations and Anaxagoras’ theory of Mind since he thinks they could not explain all things, firstly, in a unitary and, secondary, in a real way. Thence, we are to call what Plato is seeking as his ideal explanation in Phaedo “One Real E...
متن کاملTypological Description of Written Formative Feedback on Student Writing in an EFL Context
This study is a typological description of written formative feedback in an EFL context in Iran. Twenty M.A. students of TEFL participated in the study. They were required to summarize a scholarly article in each session on which the instructor would provide written corrective feedback (CF). Written formative comments were extracted, coded, and categorized into various types, such as asking for...
متن کاملThe Integrative Effect of Direct Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners' Accuracy in using English Articles
The present study was conducted to further improve the practice of written corrective feedback by integrating the two known feedback types (i.e. direct corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation). With this aim, a sample of sixty-nine high-intermediate Iranian EFL learners was assigned into different feedback groups. While the first and second groups received direct and metalinguistic e...
متن کامل